September 2021

Daylight Saving Time podcast from CNN with Jon Lovett

Just a quick post with a really thoughtful and fun podcast from CNN.

 

If that embedded player doesn’t work, you can find it here.

Overall I thought it was great, and arrives at what is certainly a reasonable conclusion, that we should allow each state to decide for itself. That is essentially the solution offered in a House Bill. The podcast doesn’t mention that bill, but does mention the Sunshine Protection Act, which does have a lot more support. 

If that is what happens, I will of course celebrate, but it just seems like that is a less likely outcome than what most legislators seem to be pushing for now, which is Permanent DST.

Anyway, the podcast is enjoyable, comprehensive, and a welcome addition to the cannon of DST coverage.

Daylight Saving Time As Distraction, the Global Edition

I’ve written before about how I think that politicians have used Daylight Saving Time as a distraction from some other topic. Probably the clearest example was when Nixon ordered a change the clocks while in the midst of Watergate — in January! (Changing the clocks is always bad, but doing it in January was just cruel.) It didn’t work, and Nixon still left office.

Now we have news from Brazil, which is considering starting DST again after stopping it a couple of years ago. The purported reason? Drought.

But this quote from an excellent AP story is telling:

“The only reason why we’re not seeing greater problems is because of the economic crises of the last few years, and lower consumption than expected.”

That is, the drought is making it so that it’s hard to generate electricity, but people are using less electricity because of massive economic problems.

Also, the COVID situation in Brazil is rotten, in no small part because the president is telling lies about the vaccines. Some god with a sense of humor gave the Brazilian health minister a case of COVID-19 so that he could not attend the U.N. General Assembly this week.

With all that going on… sure… let’s talk about how changing clocks for Daylight Saving Time will fix everything.

Park Bench in Sáo Paulo
Photo of a park bench in São Paulo, Brazil, by Ronaldo de Oliveira

In the midst of all the other pain and suffering, they may actually make people start changing clocks again, which will only add to the pain and suffering.

Of course, a part of the problem there may be where they decided to lock the clock. Brazil decided to stop changing, which is the whole goal of this site and the #LockTheClock movement. And I have always said, and I honestly believe, that if you lock the clock in standard or daylight time, it just doesn’t matter all that much, as long as you stop the changing.

But my goal is to make sure that when stop changing, we stop changing for good. I’d hate to see a place stop changing clocks, and then start again because they picked the wrong time. Is that the case in Brazil? It’s hard to say from the polls as reported in that story. 

I have to wonder… would this be coming up again if they had decided to stay in Daylight time permanently? Maybe if they had done that, people would be happier (as is indicated by a couple of studies you can find on my research page) and so there wouldn’t be any talk about giving people longer days in the summer, which is now on its way in that Southern Hemisphere country.

Brazil clearly has lots of problems. I hope they don’t compound them by going back to the barbarism of changing the clocks twice a year.


I was planning on writing about a different story in the island state of Samoa. There were a few tweets and stories I saw that this independent country in the South Pacific was going to abandon Daylight Saving Time.

But, being an old reporter, I thought maybe I should check it out. The news sources seemed a bit sketchy. 

If your mother says she loves you, the old journalism aphorism goes, check it out.

Sure enough, when I went to the newspaper of Apia, the largest city and capital of Samoa, there were no stories. The government website and twitter feed had nothing. It seems like that big of a change would have warranted at least a tweet.

So, I’m still digging around. Samoa has a rich history of changing the clock to look after their own interests. Back in 2011 the country skipped a whole day, Dec. 30, so that their days and times would match up better with New Zealand and Australia. That forced map and globe makers to redraw the international date line. So, that’s cool, and could indicate that they may have gotten rid of clock-changing. Most other islands governments closer to the equator, including Hawaii and Puerto Rico, have no DST clock changing.

Did they actually get rid of DST? When I hear back from anyone official, I’ll update this post and tweet about it.


Our last stop on our global tour for this post is Australia, where some new research shows exactly what we’ve seen everywhere else in the world, that people generally prefer having more light later in the day relative to the clocks.

In a survey of the part of Australia that sticks with Standard Time all year, survey respondents said that they would rather have Daylight Saving Time.

Just as mentioned above, geography matters for how much people want to have more daylight later in the day. “Dr. Sigler explained that the further away from the equator you were, the more you experienced the benefits of daylight savings.”

The story, unfortunately, does not get into the problems with the clock changing. It’s a bit hard to tell, but it would seem that people there would rather change the clocks twice a year just to get more sunlight later in the day during the summer. It doesn’t appear that they were asked about if they just wanted year-round Daylight Saving Time. Too bad. Maybe after the vote in Alberta, they will consider that as a possibility. 

 

DST: The one issue that can fix them all

 The classic movie Bridge Over the River Kwai is now more than 60 years old, so if you haven’t seen it, well, too bad, I’m going to ruin the ending for you.

The movie is about a British soldier who gets captured during WWII and is held in a POW camp deep in a hellish jungle. The soldier, played by Alec Guinness, plays it all by the book, and gets tortured for it. After his torture, he is directed to build a bridge.

Here’s where he goes a bit nutty, probably in part because he had just spent weeks in isolation in a hot box.

He takes over commanding his men who are building the bridge, and finds that they are doing a rotten job. They tell him that of course they are doing a rotten job, they don’t want to build a great bridge for the enemy.

Guinness’ character says that what the men need for their morale and their stiff upper lips, etc., is to do a great job on the bridge… Build something they can really be proud of. He’s a charismatic guy, so the men do just that and build a great bridge. For the enemy.

Meanwhile an American soldier is trying to, you know, win the war, so he leads a group to blow up the bridge.

Right at the end of the movie, Guinness’ character discovers the wire leading to the bomb. He tries to stop the bomb, but then he sees the American soldier. That American gets shot and killed trying to make sure the bridge gets blown up.

And then, in one of the great moments of cinema history, something clicked for the British commander. You can see it in his face, and he says, simply, “What have I done?” It dawns on him that he has lost sight of the bigger objective, and became enraptured by the fever of the moment. He gets then gets hit with shrapnel, but somehow rises up, dusts off his hat (very British, to his final moments) and stumbles over and falls on the plunger, blowing up the bridge just as the train goes over it, plunging it into the river.

Final scene of Bridge over the River Kwai

With that, democracy survives.


One of the most amazing things about the issue of Daylight Saving Time is that is totally nonpartisan. Perhaps the two highest profile politicians who want to get it done are Marco Rubio and Ed Markey. The state legislatures that have passed something include Washington and Oregon, and also Mississippi and Alabama. The Montana legislature is very conservative, and it passed a DST bill sponsored by a Democrat.

That makes it so unquestionably different from basically every other substantial issue.

You’ve probably noticed this, too, but issues that absolutely shouldn’t be political, suddenly are political.

And they all fall into buckets. If I know what you think about a football player taking a knee during a song, I also know what you think about the estate tax. If you think the pullout from Afghanistan was worse than the fact that we went to Afghanistan in the first place, I would predict that you also oppose school mask mandates. And vice versa.

Now, I’m not one to wax poetic about the old days, but one thing about a period really not that long ago was that your views on foreign policy were not really that great of an indicator of your views on local school board policies. There was just a lot more, well, freedom about what you believed. 

Others have written about this a lot, but it’s something we all know almost reflexively these days. If you see someone with a MAGA hat on, you will either give that person a salute, or you will back away slowly not making any sudden movements and hoping that the person isn’t armed.

Now I ask you: Name one issue that the science is real crowd has in common with the Trump’s election was stolen crowd. Seriously. 

Well, I’ve got one for you: Daylight Saving Time.


I’m sure there are more sophisticated ways of looking at this, but in general I think the Republican Party has three basic groups.

  1. Chamber of Commerce types, who just want a good business environment, the rule of law, free markets, etc.
  2. Libertarian types who want low taxes and less government. They’ve always been uneasy with the GOP’s stances on gay marriage, abortion and the like, but they figure the courts will sort all that out, and usually they do.
  3. Cultural warriors. Some of these are sincere anti-abortion believers, but most are just racists, gun fetishists, fabulists and/or people with serious unresolved daddy issues. 

The whole Trump phenomenon was clearly driven by the third group, and was tolerated and cynically taken advantage of by the other two groups.

(This post is not for the third group, but I’m not really worried about them reading this anyway because they don’t really go for reading.)

It’s not hard to rile up that third group and motivate them to action. Give them a little fear — fear of dark skinned people, fear of globalists, fear of “socialism” and especially fear of the Democratic party — and they will buy your red hats, donate money, show up at rallies and wave flags. So many flags.

For it to work, you must also convince them not to believe what they see with their own eyes.

The thing that we’ve seen happen over the last five years or so is that elected Republicans, party leaders, and big money donors have been completely taken over by the circus barkers. We see little snippets of news every so often that they don’t really believe any of the democracy-destroying rhetoric, but they fear that if they say so out loud, the third group will turn on them. That is what happens, too, so it’s a rational idea. Some have said that’s fine and just left. I’m not sure how the ones who stay sleep at night.

What I keep hoping for, perhaps naïvely, is that at some point they will come face-to-face with what they’ve done. They will realize that they are the British Commander who has built a huge, solid, totally functional bridge, and the bridge they’ve built is for the enemies of democracy.

What have I done?

What will be the issue that could prompt this response?

I’m hoping it’s Daylight Saving Time.

After all, DST is an actual governmental issue. The government decides what the clocks say. Right now the clocks are actually killing people.

What I’m hoping is that somehow this issue will be the one that will make them snap out of their Trumpian coma. That they’ll look up and see that they don’t need to oppose Every Single Thing proposed by Democrats. They will see that Democrats are actually Americans who care about their country and want things here to be better. 

They will see that Democrats are not actually the enemy.

The true enemies are common enemies. Changing the clock twice a year… that’s an enemy that we can defeat, working together.

Once they have said: What have I done? and fixed DST, then they can go on to face other common enemies. 

COVID does not have to be a political issue. The disease, instead of Democrats, could be the enemy that must be defeated. Wearing a mask during the flu epidemic of 1919 was seen as patriotic, and getting the polio vaccine was something everyone did to unify the country.

Climate change? Republican Teddy Roosevelt started the National Parks and Republican Richard Nixon started the EPA. Conserving the environment is a conservative idea.

But we can’t use one of those big topics to be the catalyst. We need to start with something small. Tiny, in fact.

That’s just what Daylight Saving Time could be: The tiny issue that we drop into the test tube that changes everything.

 

Voting Guide: Daylight Saving Time in Alberta

Alberta is not the most famous of the Canadian provinces. It’s probably best known as the home of Calgary, and the 1988 Winter Olympics, which became even more famous because that’s when the Jamaican Bobsled team made its international debut, as featured in the Disney film Cool Runnings.

But Alberta may soon be known for something else: Fixing Daylight Saving Time.

CalgaryPhoto of the Bow River east of Downtown Calgary by Igor Kyryliuk

You see, while there have been dozens of state and provincial legislatures that have debated or passed bills that would #LockTheClock, there has never been a binding vote of the people. That will all change on October 18, 2021.

(Yes, there was a vote in California, but it wasn’t binding. It was a complex, procedural bill, and even though it was worded into a pretzel on the ballot, voters thought that it might help to end the clock-changing madness, so they approved it by a wide margin.)

That means that Alberta voters are now the first people in the world who will get to have a direct say in ending the clock madness since the passage of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 in the U.S. While that law wasn’t binding on Canada, the provinces have hewn closely to the U.S. since then.

So, if you are a registered Alberta voter, how should you vote? I’ll break it down for you here:

What is the DST language I’ll be voting on?

Do you want Alberta to adopt year-round Daylight Saving Time, which is summer hours, eliminating the need to change our clocks twice a year?

By the way, this language is great, I think. It’s even shorter and more clear than the language that I recommended when I first wrote about this. I thought they might want to ask two questions: 1. Should we stop changing the clocks? and 2. What time zone should we lock in to?

The officials decided to make it much more clear and direct. It’s true, there will be some in the strident and vocal minority who will complain about the lack of an option to stay in Standard Time year-round, but it would appear that there are even fewer of them in Canada than there are in the U.S.

And there aren’t many here.

The people coming up with that language were probably informed by a survey done early in 2020 showing that 91 percent of those surveyed by the government wanted to stick to the summer time year-round. Why go to the hassle of two questions when you know that one of the options doesn’t even have the support of 10 percent of the electorate?

Voting Guide

So, we know that nearly everyone in Alberta likes the idea of year-round Daylight Saving Time, but when it comes time to vote, individual voters may have some concerns, and want to know all of what’s involved. I’ll break it down here as clearly as possible.

Reasons to Vote Yes for permanent Daylight Saving Time

Survey after survey has confirmed that people hate changing the clocks, and that’s been true forever.

The thing that’s changed in recent years is a raft of research showing that it’s not just unpopular, it’s deadly. I’ve written about this a lot, and if you want to do your own research, you can do that here.

So, if it is actually deadly, and if the legislatures in the provinces and the states know that, why hasn’t it changed? The answer is that while legislatures are made up of “leaders” there is often a hesitancy to get too far out in front on any issue. A lot of stuff gets debated, and sometimes even passed, but so far all the votes have been to change only if some number of other nearby states/provinces also move.

All that to say, one of the pros of voting yes is that you will send a message to the politicians that you really do want them to fix this, and fix it right away. That is a message that will be heard in Alberta, and if I have anything to do with it (and I do) I’ll make sure that lawmakers all over the U.S. hear about it, too.

The concern from some lawmakers has been that they don’t want their province/state to be out of synch with their neighbors. That’s legitimate, but one only needs to look at Arizona to realize that’s not really a big issue. That state does not change clocks, and the people there love it. One time a legislator proposed that Arizona should start changing clocks just to help with business, and he go so overwhelmed with constituent pushback that he actually held a press conference to announce that he was killing his own bill. Oh, and if business is suffering in Arizona, it’s hard to see how as that is one of the fastest growing and most prosperous states in the U.S.

In short, the pro side of voting yes is that you will get what you want — permanent Daylight Saving Time — and you may just help the rest of Canada and the U.S. get it, too.

Reasons to vote no

I’m clearly advocating that you vote yes, but there is one legitimate reason to vote no: Perhaps you like changing the clocks twice per year? If so, I guess you could vote no, in spite of the fact that you’ll be putting your neighbors at risk by doing so.

Let’s say you are a person who just doesn’t really care that much… You adjust easily to the time change. You think you might want to vote no just to make it less confusing for the neighbors of Alberta. Sorry, but that’s just not that good of a reason. Again, see Arizona. It’s slightly confusing for others dealing with that state, but it doesn’t actually cost any business.

Another reason to vote no would be that you prefer staying on Standard Time, the time we use in the winter, all year long. That’s a legitimate point of view, it just happens to be a very small minority. As we saw in that poll from the provincial government, you are among less than 10 percent of the population.

So, you could vote no just because that’s your preference, but two things about that: 

  1. You’ll lose. This thing is going to pass by a wide margin. And…
  2. You’ll be hurting the cause that people like you who prefer the winter time and people who prefer the summer time agree on, which is that it’s crazy to change the clocks twice a year.

If this measure in Alberta passes two-to-one or better, it will send a really strong message to all of Canada and the U.S.

And once you’ve done away with the clock changing, if it turns out that the winter mornings really are too dark for too long, you can go to the government and ask for one last change — a change to permanent Standard Time. If enough of your fellow citizens agree, that will be a much easier change to make.

Is there anything else I should know before voting in Alberta?

Not really. There’s lots and lots of research, and you can certainly read all of that.

But at the most basic level, this is something proper for you and the voters of Alberta to vote on. After all, the whole idea of time is that it is an agreement. In a modern society, we all need to agree on what it means that a flight leaves at 10:15 a.m., or that a radio program starts at 2 p.m., or that we are going to meet some friends for a beverage at 6:30 p.m. That’s what time really is.

Given that time is an agreement among people, it makes perfect sense that the people of Alberta get to declare: We don’t want to change our agreed-on time twice a year any more. Just set the clock, and leave it. We don’t need to be sleep-deprived in the spring. We don’t need it to be pitch-black at 5 p.m. on November 7th. Just set the clocks for summer time, and leave them there all year, OK?

If you do vote to end the clock changing by a wide, wide margin, that will be the alarm clock that will be heard around the world.